Advertisement

Xiaomi 13T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S23: Which brand wins out?

Xiaomi 13T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S23: Which brand wins out?


Which brand prevails between the Xiaomi 13T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S23?  The recent announcements of the Xiaomi 13T and Xiaomi 13T Pro have added to the saturation of the smartphone market. 

Xiaomi 13T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S23: Which brand wins out?

We wanted to go through some of the main differences between the Xiaomi 13T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S23 as another Android phone is about to hit the market.


To make an informed choice on your next mobile upgrade, keep reading to learn everything you need to know about these two devices.Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
The 13T Pro is equipped by Xiaomi with a MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ chipset. According to Xiaomi, the integrated Arm Immortalis-G715 processor can give speeds of up to 3.35GHz.Gaming will be smooth thanks to the GPU. 


Samsung chose to include the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chip in the Galaxy S23 as it does in its premium Galaxy S23 Ultra model. This chip has an improved Andreo GPU and a higher maximum speed of 3.36GHz. The Galaxy S23 impressed us with its lightning-fast performance while in use, handling everything from triple-A gaming to fluid navigation and scrolling. 


The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is more powerful than the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, according to early benchmarks, however you probably won't notice a significant difference.
                           

Hypercharging the Xiaomi 13T Pro at 120W
The Xiaomi 13T Pro has 120W HyperCharge, which enables quick charging, which is one of its main selling factors. Xiaomi claims that it takes only 19 minutes to charge completely. It is a fantastic solution for people who frequently forget to charge their device because it may achieve 36% battery power after just five minutes of charging. 


The Galaxy S23 has a sizable 3900mAh battery, and we discovered that it readily lasted all day. With only a 25W charger supported, the charging speeds were a little underwhelming. As a consequence, the battery charged 50% in 29 minutes and completely in 1 hour and 20 minutes.

Post a Comment

0 Comments